Pre-approving Members: Difference between revisions
From Freegle Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Cons of | ===Cons of closed membership:=== | ||
* It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle. | * It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle. | ||
* It makes more work for the moderators. | * It makes more work for the moderators. |
Latest revision as of 11:30, 15 May 2018
The best option to make Freegling accessible and attractive to new people is to have open membership.
Pros of open membership:
- Members can get posting immediately
- they may be joining to get rid of stuff in a hurry
- the internet is an instant thing so demonstrating how to be an active Freegler from the first few clicks to the site is essential.
- Saves moderators time.
- Gives moderators more time to spend promoting the group and engaging with members in a positive way.
- More potential members will join because the joining process is much easier.
- Members don't have to reply to a joining email, which means they won't be lost somewhere in the joining process.
- Applicants won't be discouraged by what they see as intrusive questions.
- Moderators don't have to send out reminders.
Cons of closed membership:
- It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle.
- It makes more work for the moderators.
- Members often don't reply to a joining email, so groups are losing potential members.
- The more complex the joining process is, the more potential members will be put off joining.
- People might not like or be suspicious of being asked questions.
- Spammers might join anyway, so moderators could be just wasting their precious time.
Back to: Other bits and bobs or How to or Admin