Pre-approving Members: Difference between revisions

From Freegle Wiki
No edit summary
Wiki revamp: restructure & modernise
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The best option to make Freegling accessible and attractive to new people is to have open membership.
The best way to make freegling accessible and attractive to new people is open membership.


 
==Pros of open membership==
 
*Members can start posting immediately
=== Pros of open membership: ===
*Members can get posting immediately  
**they may be joining to get rid of stuff in a hurry
**they may be joining to get rid of stuff in a hurry
**the internet is an instant thing so demonstrating how to be an active Freegler from the first few clicks to the site is essential.
**since the internet is instant, showing how to be an active freegler from the first few clicks is essential
*Saves moderators time.
*Saves moderators time
*Gives moderators more time to spend promoting the group and engaging with members in a positive way.
*Gives moderators more time for promoting the community and engaging positively with members
*More potential members will join because the joining process is much easier.
*More potential members join, because the process is much easier
*Members don't have to reply to a joining email, which means they won't be lost somewhere in the joining process.
*Members don't have to reply to a joining email, so they're not lost partway through joining
*Applicants won't be discouraged by what they see as intrusive questions.
*Applicants aren't put off by what feel like intrusive questions
*Moderators don't have to send out reminders.
*Moderators don't have to send reminders
 
 
===Cons of open membership:===
* It is an unnecessary barrier for people who wish to freegle.
* It makes more work for the moderators.
* Members often don't reply to a joining email, so groups are losing potential members.
* The more complex the joining process is, the more potential members will be put off joining.
* People might not like or be suspicious of being asked questions.
* Spammers might join anyway, so moderators could be just wasting their precious time.
 
 
 


Back to: [[Other bits and bobs]] or [[How to]] or [[Admin]]
==Cons of closed membership==
* An unnecessary barrier for people who want to freegle
* More work for moderators
* Members often don't reply to a joining email, so communities lose potential members
* The more complex the joining process, the more potential members are put off
* People may dislike, or be suspicious of, being asked questions
* Spammers might join anyway, so moderators could be wasting their time regardless


Back to: [[How to]] or [[Admin]]


[[category:How To]]
[[Category:Moderating with ModTools]]

Latest revision as of 12:00, 17 July 2026

The best way to make freegling accessible and attractive to new people is open membership.

Pros of open membership

  • Members can start posting immediately
    • they may be joining to get rid of stuff in a hurry
    • since the internet is instant, showing how to be an active freegler from the first few clicks is essential
  • Saves moderators time
  • Gives moderators more time for promoting the community and engaging positively with members
  • More potential members join, because the process is much easier
  • Members don't have to reply to a joining email, so they're not lost partway through joining
  • Applicants aren't put off by what feel like intrusive questions
  • Moderators don't have to send reminders

Cons of closed membership

  • An unnecessary barrier for people who want to freegle
  • More work for moderators
  • Members often don't reply to a joining email, so communities lose potential members
  • The more complex the joining process, the more potential members are put off
  • People may dislike, or be suspicious of, being asked questions
  • Spammers might join anyway, so moderators could be wasting their time regardless

Back to: How to or Admin