May 2011 Poll: Difference between revisions
m Protected "May 2011 Poll" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
Wiki revamp: restructure & modernise |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This poll was held in May, initial result announced on 31st May 2011 on Central [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/21382] | This poll was held in May, initial result announced on 31st May 2011 on Central [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/21382]. | ||
'''First question:''' | '''First question:''' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
Abstain - 6 votes - 5.25%<br> | Abstain - 6 votes - 5.25%<br> | ||
'''Second question:''' | |||
'''Second | |||
Proposed procedure for elected roles: | Proposed procedure for elected roles: | ||
| Line 23: | Line 21: | ||
If a vacancy for any elected post (Rep, Ombudsman, Returning Officer etc.) occurs within 3 months of election, the role vacancy should be offered to the next highest voted candidate, provided they gained at least 75% of the votes of the lowest successful candidate in the most recent election. | If a vacancy for any elected post (Rep, Ombudsman, Returning Officer etc.) occurs within 3 months of election, the role vacancy should be offered to the next highest voted candidate, provided they gained at least 75% of the votes of the lowest successful candidate in the most recent election. | ||
Elections from now on will state that this auto-promotion will be in effect and that there will be | Elections from now on will state that this auto-promotion will be in effect and that there will be an option to vote for 'none or no others'. | ||
Do you want Freegle to adopt this procedure? | Do you want Freegle to adopt this procedure? | ||
Yes - adopt this procedure - 103 | Yes - adopt this procedure - 103 votes - 90.35%<br> | ||
No - do not adopt this procedure - 9 | No - do not adopt this procedure - 9 votes - 7.9%<br> | ||
Abstain - 2 votes - 1.75%<br> | Abstain - 2 votes - 1.75%<br> | ||
------------------------- | ------------------------- | ||
There are a few votes that need checking | There are a few votes that need checking - a couple that have put their user name as their group and a couple that have voted twice - but none of these are sufficient to change things enough to bring about a different result. | ||
as their group and a couple have voted twice but none of these are sufficient to | |||
change things enough to bring about a different result | |||
Both the constitution and the auto-promotion procedure are therefore carried by a good majority. | |||
The final "corrected if necessary" result after checks have been made will be published in about a week. (1) | |||
Stuart Fraser | Stuart Fraser<br> | ||
R.O. | |||
. | |||
(1) | (1) Adjusted and final result announced 7th June 2011 [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/21473] - percentages/results above changed to reflect this. | ||
Adjusted and final result announced 7th June 2011 [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreegleUK-Central/message/21473] - percentages/results above changed to reflect this. | |||
Back to [[Polls]] | Back to [[Polls]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Organisation & Governance]] | ||
[[Category:Policies, Procedures, Remits]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:00, 17 July 2026
This poll was held in May, initial result announced on 31st May 2011 on Central [1].
First question:
The Reps have suggested opening a bank account for Freegle with Unity Bank.
In order to do this a constitution needs to be provided along with other paperwork. Previous discussions on Structure about a governing document have now been brought forward and a new document drafted and discussed.
If this document is approved, it will require a 66% majority of those voting in a subsequent poll to make changes, but a simple majority is all that is needed for acceptance in this poll.
Do you approve the Freegle Constitution?
Yes - approve the Freegle constitution - 106 votes - 93%
No - do not approve the Freegle constitution - 2 votes - 1.75%
Abstain - 6 votes - 5.25%
Second question:
Proposed procedure for elected roles:
If a vacancy for any elected post (Rep, Ombudsman, Returning Officer etc.) occurs within 3 months of election, the role vacancy should be offered to the next highest voted candidate, provided they gained at least 75% of the votes of the lowest successful candidate in the most recent election.
Elections from now on will state that this auto-promotion will be in effect and that there will be an option to vote for 'none or no others'.
Do you want Freegle to adopt this procedure?
Yes - adopt this procedure - 103 votes - 90.35%
No - do not adopt this procedure - 9 votes - 7.9%
Abstain - 2 votes - 1.75%
There are a few votes that need checking - a couple that have put their user name as their group and a couple that have voted twice - but none of these are sufficient to change things enough to bring about a different result.
Both the constitution and the auto-promotion procedure are therefore carried by a good majority.
The final "corrected if necessary" result after checks have been made will be published in about a week. (1)
Stuart Fraser
R.O.
(1) Adjusted and final result announced 7th June 2011 [2] - percentages/results above changed to reflect this.
Back to Polls
