Start Group Report 2009-11

FREEGLE START GROUP
November 16th 2009
SUMMARY OF POSTS FROM MESSAGE 123-277
This group currently has 30 members, and is open to any member of Freegle UK
Central who would like to be involved: http://uk.groups.
yahoo.com/group/freegle- people/
The spokesperson for this group at present is Jean (Trafford)
Topics covered during this period have been.
• New group applications.
Should we expect new groups to commit themselves to any present terms and
conditions, and include a clause about accepting any future ones which may be
decided upon.
• New groups in old places and whether the current team approving new groups
now needs an expanded remit.
It was decided that it is time to get a mandate on a time limit for accepting
other than completely new groups and ex Freecycle groups. Again all the
questions on the time frame and whether to give Freecycle Groups preference over
other applicants, leading to discussions that we now really needed to get some
decisions made by the moderators so we were not leaving applications stuck in
limbo.
Which questions needed to be answered first was a much more complex issue than
at first thought. This led to the first poll questions being formatted as
follows (you will find them on the Structure poll currently running with these
numbers); and hopefully on the completion of the voting we can go forward.
17) The current procedure assumes that we do not need to consider IMOD run
Freecycle groups, either Yahoo or My Freecycle when approving groups. Is this
assumption correct?
18) Should we approve groups in areas partly or fully covered by locally-run
Freecycle Yahoo groups
19) Should we approve groups in areas partly or fully covered by locally-run
Freecycle My Freecycle groups
20. Until now we have been giving Freecycle groups time to consider moving over.
When should that thinking time be over?
The next questions are about how we go about deciding if a group should be
considered if either questions 2 or 3 have a yes result.
21. When an application is received, should the Freecycle group/s in question be
contacted and given one last chance to move?
22) It has been suggested each Freecycle group be decided on its own merits ie
not allow groups in areas where the Freecycle group has good relationships with
other local groups and/or recognise Freegle groups and treat them as though they
were the
same thing. Allow applications in areas where the Freecycle group is never
planning to move or is unfriendly.
23) Currently, an interim team is approving new groups but only in areas without
locally run Freecycle groups. This process will probably change in future as
the structure of Freegle is established. Subject to the results of this poll
should the interim team be given the mandate to approve groups in areas with
locally run Freecycle groups, or should we wait until the final group approval
process has been established? (Please note - a yes result for question 7 will
force an automatic no result to this question )
• Starting a group
What help is available, whether someone should be appointed as joint owner to go
in to help out etc? It was decided whoever helped did not need to have ownership
as they could do anything required with moderator privileges. That it would be a
good idea on a voluntary basis to have a local team available to help out for a
month or so for new start ups, but to keep it as local as possible.
• Group Settings
It was asked if the start up team had standard groups setting that new groups
were put on. It was explained that new owners were encouraged to do this
themselves and so learn how Yahoo mod tools work but that they were advised to
use certain settings. Jean agreed to do a page for the moderator's manual which
will cover the recommended settings for starting up a group. She has also agreed
to draft some FAQ's and responses and will put them up here for discussion
before passing them to the people team.
• Group overlap
This was covered by the previous poll results, but was made clear that it is
only for the boundaries when a new group is set up. It does not prevent a group
owner from taking in members proper to other approved groups if they feel they
meet their own criteria for membership. The whole question of membership overlap
is a major reason why it helps to communicate with other local groups and have
some sort of agreed policies on posting.
Back toFreegle Start or go to next report Start Group Report 2009-12