Organisation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
One area under consideration is whether we should consider becoming a charity. Have a look at the page [[Charitable Status]] for a summary of the questions for and against this. | One area under consideration is whether we should consider becoming a charity. Have a look at the page [[Charitable Status]] for a summary of the questions for and against this. | ||
The question of trademarking the name Freegle is also a recurring topic of discussion. An interesting article to read about other's experiences on this can be found at [http://www.beneschlaw.com/pubs/xprPubDetail.aspx?xpST=PubDetail&pub=2485] | |||
The following links are for documents being polled December 2010: | The following links are for documents being polled December 2010: | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 19 December 2010
Freegle has been formed as a collective of groups. We are still very new in terms of our national organisational structure as we are building ourselves democratically (and all that consultation can take a long time!).
We have an internal governing document being drafted by the Freegle Structure working group. Please join that group if you would like to be more involved in this aspect of your organisation.
One area under consideration is whether we should consider becoming a charity. Have a look at the page Charitable Status for a summary of the questions for and against this.
The question of trademarking the name Freegle is also a recurring topic of discussion. An interesting article to read about other's experiences on this can be found at [1]
The following links are for documents being polled December 2010: Freegle Working Groups, Election and Poll Procedures, Financial Management and Controls and Freegle Reps Role and Remit
Back to The Freegle Organisation
