Talk:Appeals Panel - Revision history

Jacky at 15:37, 13 September 2010

2010-09-13T15:37:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 13 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

			<br>

			I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear.  It isn't in this version, so I have amended it.  Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010

	I have no ~~problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information~~ on the page ~~about~~ the ~~document and the document that has been agreed~~ should be ~~clear~~.  ~~It isn't in this version~~, ~~so I have amended it.  Jacky Barrett 10.9.~~2010		<br>

			That sounds reasonable. But I have no idea what wasn't agreed on the page. I would have thought that the WHOLE page, for these types of pages, should be what is agreed. Eh? --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 14:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)



	~~That sounds reasonable. But I have no idea~~ what ~~wasn't agreed on~~ the ~~page~~. ~~I would have thought that~~ the ~~WHOLE~~ page, ~~for these types of pages~~, should be ~~what is agreed. Eh~~? ~~--[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 14:52, 12 September~~ 2010 ~~(UTC)~~		In the first para, the last sentence explains that what follows is the draft document.  i think there will always need to be bits added to the page with agreed/voted on documents, because, at the very least, the message number/date/method it was agreed to be adopted should probably be recorded here?   Jacky Barrett 13.9.2010

Paul Thompson at 14:52, 12 September 2010

2010-09-12T14:52:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 12 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

	I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear.  It isn't in this version, so I have amended it.  Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010

			I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear.  It isn't in this version, so I have amended it.  Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010



			That sounds reasonable. But I have no idea what wasn't agreed on the page. I would have thought that the WHOLE page, for these types of pages, should be what is agreed. Eh? --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 14:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Jacky at 07:33, 10 September 2010

2010-09-10T07:33:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 10 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson\|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

			I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear.  It isn't in this version, so I have amended it.  Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010

Paul Thompson: Created page with 'I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using th…'

2010-09-07T09:25:27Z

Created page with 'I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using th…'

New page

I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)