Jacky at 10:28, 3 December 2019

2019-12-03T10:28:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:28, 3 December 2019
Line 230:		Line 230:


	Back to [[Freegle Representative Group]] or go to next [[Freegle Reps Report 2010-07-08]]<br>		Back to Freegle Representative Group or go to next [[Freegle Reps Report 2010-07-08]]<br>
	[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]		[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]

Edwh at 10:11, 18 August 2010

2010-08-18T10:11:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 18 August 2010
Line 230:		Line 230:


	Back to [[Freegle Representative Group]] or go to next [[Freegle Reps Report 2010-08~~-13~~]]<br>		Back to [[Freegle Representative Group]] or go to next [[Freegle Reps Report 2010-07-08]]<br>
	[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]		[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]

Jacky at 07:48, 18 August 2010

2010-08-18T07:48:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 18 August 2010
Line 230:		Line 230:


	Back to [[Freegle Representative Group]] <br>		Back to [[Freegle Representative Group]] or go to next [[Freegle Reps Report 2010-08-13]]<br>
	[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]		[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]

Jacky at 07:33, 21 July 2010

2010-07-21T07:33:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 21 July 2010
Line 229:		Line 229:
	left it too late this time.		left it too late this time.


			Back to [[Freegle Representative Group]] <br>
	[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]		[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]

Jacky at 15:51, 18 July 2010

2010-07-18T15:51:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 18 July 2010
Line 229:		Line 229:
	left it too late this time.		left it too late this time.

	[[Category:Reps Reports]]		[[Category:Freegle Reps Reports]]

Chriscant: Protected "Freegle Reps Report 2010-05-31": Read Only Group Report ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2010-06-14T08:47:27Z

Protected "Freegle Reps Report 2010-05-31": Read Only Group Report ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:47, 14 June 2010
(No difference)

Chriscant: Created page with 'Covering period from April 15th to May 31st 2010 This month we are trialling a different format for the Reps report. Since all of our decisions are backed up by polls, we have s…'

2010-06-14T08:46:08Z

Created page with 'Covering period from April 15th to May 31st 2010 This month we are trialling a different format for the Reps report. Since all of our decisions are backed up by polls, we have s…'

New page

Covering period from April 15th to May 31st 2010

This month we are trialling a different format for the Reps report. Since all of
our decisions are backed up by polls, we have set out below a summary of all the
non-confidential polls and the results.

As at 31st May there were three open polls which will be published in in the
next report.

We have done this report for a six week period because of the hiatus during the
second half of April until the voluntary suspension of one Rep.

There were 28 polls during the period (just over one every other day) and there
have been 1679 messages on the group during the period (averaging 37 messages
per day). The polls are always the culmination of discussions and provide a
record of our decisions.

Areas covered that were not polled in this period (either because they were
actions following previous polls or have not required a poll yet) include:

* Progressing and facilitating four separate complaints / appeals.
* Progressing a finance policy and procedures document and undertaking further research in respect of a bank account for Freegle.
* Discussing the draft Mediation and Appeal document.
* Talking to the Charities Commission.
* Agreeing an ADMIN for Central regarding ex-Group Owners access to Central.
* Agreed on Reps link members for each Working Group, as requested by Structure - to be published with other Working group related recommendations.

Warm Regards,

Cat, Edward, Jane, Kath, Mark, Ollie, Paul and Sian

= Polls and Results =

Note, the date quoted is when the poll opened. Any Rep can start a poll at any
time.

'''Abandoned Polls - 3'''

'''Confidential Polls - 3'''

== April 15th==

I agree with the proposed Remit & Process for the
Manchester/Stockport/Wigan Investigation Team

Result: Agree

==April 15th==

The Start group has proposed some further guidelines to how that GAT examines
groups. The Reps have been asked to sign off on the use of these new guidelines.

Result: Approve.

==April 16th==

Susan and Jacky should be confirmed in position as handling the info mailbox.

Result: Agree

==April 20th==

Should we have a Rep observer on Investigation Panels to monitor that the
investigation stays within remit, and interject if it appears not to be; to
answer questions on general matters of policy but not specific cases; and to
liaise with the Reps to answer any other questions?

Result: Yes

==April 20th==

Investigation Panels will create a closed Yahoo group to discuss the
investigation and store evidence. Should the group remain closed for ever, or
should we assume it will be opened one day?

Result: Investigation Panel Groups should remain closed forever

==April 21st==

Should the creator of a Poll on Reps be entitled to delete it if no one has yet
voted on it?

Result: Yes

==April 22nd==

We should appoint Kath to make an initial reply to all enquiries and complaints
to the reps@ilovefreegle. org before a full response is agreed by the Reps.

Result: Agree

==April 22nd==

Should we publish the results of our polls* in the monthly summary that we send
to Central? *There may be some polls which should remain confidential,
publishing will be at the discretion of the reps.

Result: Agree

==April 27th==

We should send an email to begin the process of electing a new returning
officer.

Result: Agreed

==April 27th==

It is becoming apparent that Central would like a proper removal procedure put
in place before Carol's status is ultimately decided. It is proposed that all
business of the Reps is immediately suspended and a procedure for the removal of
a Rep by the other Reps is agreed as a matter of urgency.

Result: Agree

==April 29th==

Please read the proposed ADMIN regarding the situation with Carol to see if you
agree with the proposed course of action, and that the message can go to
Central. Minor improvements to the wording can easily be accommodated.

Result: Agree

==May 4th==

We should send the Equal Ops policy in to Legal for their review.

Result: Yes

==May 4th==

Structure have proposed working group roles. Do we support this proposal?

Result: No majority; most votes were abstain. Further discussion and work
required; Paul to lead.

==May 7th==

We agree with Jacqui H's suggestion that candidates for the Returning Officer
role should be that they be asked to write a brief bit about themselves and
their expertise so that voters will have something to go on. We also suggest
that there is an opportunity for Central to ask the candidates questions, as was
done for the Reps' election.

Result: Agree

==May 7th==

The Freegle Group Assessment Team (GAT) propose that a GAT co-ordinator carries
out certain tasks (as defined within the proposal sent to the Reps). They would
like Tom (from Cramlington) to take on the role of GAT co-ordinator.

Result: Agree. Note, we later decided that the role was better described as
Group Launch Co-ordinator.

==May 7th==

We should accept Peter Morris's offer to take over updating the blog on the
website.

Result: Agree

==May 7th==

Jonathan Woods should be asked to proof read Caroline Holding's draft FAQs. If
he agrees, he should also be given the Reps comments on the draft FAQs.

Result: Agree

==May 13th==

The Returning Officer role should not include any candidate selection.

Result: Agree

==May 13th==

There should be questions for candidates for the Returning Officer role.

Result: Agree

==May 14th==

We should ask the Media Working Group to review the 'blog' on the Freegle
website, to include: Whether the title 'blog' is accurate. Whether the
categorisation of content is useful. Whether some of the categories should be
linked from elsewhere on the website. How the updating should be handled.

Result: Agree

==May 15th==

Did you send an offlist email to David Benison (Moray)?

Result: No (unanimous)

=Abandoned polls=

==April 15th==

The Start group has proposed some further guidelines to how that GAT examines
groups. The Reps have been asked to sign off on the use of these new
guidelines.

Result: Abandon Poll. This was because we could agree on most of the
guidelines, it was just one that we were unhappy with, so we abandoned the poll,
and started a new poll on the same day with the guidelines that we were happy
with.

==April 27th==

It is becoming apparent that Central would like a proper removal procedure put
in place before Carol's status is ultimately decided. In the meantime, the
Freegle Representative group very much needs to be able to get on with work.
This includes the need to be able to trust the confidentiality of the
FreegleReps yahoo group. As such, I feel Carol should be temporarily suspended
as a Rep pending the outcome of the policy definition process. This suspension
would include removal from the FreegleReps yahoo group.

Result: Abandon Poll. This was because the Reps do not have the remit to
suspend one of their member.

==May 13th==

We should publicise the Returning Officer vacancy via mails to -owner addresses.

Result: Abandon Poll. This was because we agreed should do this in future but
left it too late this time.

[[Category:Reps Reports]]