Talk:Appeals Panel: Difference between revisions
From Freegle Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --[[User:Paul Thompson|Paul Thompson]] 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear. It isn't in this version, so I have amended it. Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010 | |||
I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear. It isn't in this version, so I have amended it. Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010 | |||
That sounds reasonable. But I have no idea what wasn't agreed on the page. I would have thought that the WHOLE page, for these types of pages, should be what is agreed. Eh? --[[User:Paul Thompson|Paul Thompson]] 14:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:52, 12 September 2010
I've changed this page to use the wiki provided section and number formatting. If this isn't ideal,then of course we have undo (as in the page history). However, I think using the wiki formatting makes the pages easier to read. --Paul Thompson 09:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
I have no problem with standardising the format of key documents, but the information on the page about the document and the document that has been agreed should be clear. It isn't in this version, so I have amended it. Jacky Barrett 10.9.2010
That sounds reasonable. But I have no idea what wasn't agreed on the page. I would have thought that the WHOLE page, for these types of pages, should be what is agreed. Eh? --Paul Thompson 14:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
