Development Group Report 2018 04: Difference between revisions

From Freegle Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "'''Development Group Report : April 2018 ''' 77 members ====Task 82 - Finance Procedures: Review of tender/contract limits==== This discussion is still ongoing. ====Task...")
 
Line 17: Line 17:


====The Proofreaders group====
====The Proofreaders group====
http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Proofreaders - was closed down in line with http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Unused_and_Redundant_National_Groups_Procedure . This group did good work early on, but the quantity of documentation we produce now has made their work
http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Proofreaders - was closed down in line with http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Unused_and_Redundant_National_Groups_Procedure . This group was valuable early on, but the much reduced quantity of documentation we produce now has made their support unnecessary.
 


====Wiki Review====
====Wiki Review====

Revision as of 11:17, 1 May 2018

Development Group Report : April 2018 77 members


Task 82 - Finance Procedures: Review of tender/contract limits

This discussion is still ongoing.


Task 83: Abandoned Group Procedure review

We polled on a revised document and recommended the Board to adopt it. The Board agreed and the wiki is now updated - http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Abandoned_Groups_Procedure


Review of proposed monthly letter to Yahoo groups

The Board asked the group to review the monthly letter they intend to send to Yahoo only groups, regarding the need to join Freegle Direct,


The Proofreaders group

http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Proofreaders - was closed down in line with http://wiki.ilovefreegle.org/Unused_and_Redundant_National_Groups_Procedure . This group was valuable early on, but the much reduced quantity of documentation we produce now has made their support unnecessary.

Wiki Review

Ongoing and nearing completion. The view has been taken that FD should be intuitive to use and that detailed explanations of what is seen on the screen are not needed. Nothing on the wiki is unrecoverable - whether it is deleted or archived - so if it is found that we have been a bit draconian in our review, pages can be retrieved.


All volunteers are welcome to join Development to view and/or participate in the discussions.


Links